Borel-Cantelli Lemma

Let be a sequence of events and

  1. If , then .
  2. If and are Independent, then .
    • The independence is crucial here. The lemma does not hold if the events are not independent.

Proof

Part 1

Since the infinite sum is bounded, we have . By the definition of , we have

Alternative Proof for Part 1

Let be the indicator r.v. for . We know that happens if and only if . By Monotone Convergence Theorem,

Therefore, a.s. In other words, with probability 1, will not happen, i.e., .

Part 2

Let . By De Morgan’s law, we have

Note that the Independence of implies the independence of (using the conditional probability definition). Again, by De Morgan,

Note that for any finite . We claim that :

Therefore, and then