Borel-Cantelli Lemma
Let be a sequence of events and
- If , then .
- If and are Independent, then .
- The independence is crucial here. The lemma does not hold if the events are not independent.
Proof
Part 1
Since the infinite sum is bounded, we have . By the definition of , we have
Alternative Proof for Part 1
Let be the indicator r.v. for . We know that happens if and only if . By Monotone Convergence Theorem,
Therefore, a.s. In other words, with probability 1, will not happen, i.e., .
Part 2
Let . By De Morgan’s law, we have
Note that the Independence of implies the independence of (using the conditional probability definition). Again, by De Morgan,
Note that for any finite . We claim that :
Therefore, and then