Pairwise Independence Is Not Mutual Independence
A wrong example
Apparently, and . Therefore, these three events are not pairwise independent nor mutually independent.
However, in light of this, we can have a correct example using a 4-sided die. Roll a fair 4-sided die whose outcome is in . Define three events
Then we have
But
Therefore, pairwise independence is not mutual independence.
Simplestness
Define What’s Simpler
To show the above example is the “simplest,” we need first to define the partial order to compare simpleness: we say an example is simpler than , if involves fewer events than , or the cardinality of ‘s sample space is smaller when and involve the same number of events. Since the number of events cannot be less than 3, otherwise mutual independence will reduce to pairwise independence, we need to find a smaller sample space for a simpler example.
Select the Events
Consider the sample space . The nonempty events are
We call the first three events size-1 events, the following three events size-2 events, and the last one size-3 event. To compose the example, we need to select three events , , . The size-3 event cannot be selected, because it is the superset of all other events, and hence is not independent of any of them. We can select up to one size-1 event; otherwise, the intersection of two size-1 events is empty, indicating that these two events are not pairwise independent (here we assume nonzero probability). However, when we select one size-1 event, the other two size-2 events either are the supersets of it, or have no intersection with it; in either situation, they are not pairwise independent. Therefore, can only be the three size-2 events.
Calculate the Probabilities
Let the probability mass function be
Then we have
This also indicates mutual independence, because
In summary, such an example with a sample space of cardinality 3 does not exist.